What was the outcome of US v. Schultz (2003)?

In the case of US v. Schultz (2003), the court determined that Schultz falsely claimed Egyptian provenance for several pieces of art that were being sold. This misrepresentation was a violation of the law, specifically the National Stolen Property Act, as the artworks in question were allegedly stolen artifacts from Egypt. The outcome of this case underscored the serious consequences of misrepresenting the provenance of art, which is crucial not only for legal ownership but also for upholding ethical standards in the art market. The case highlighted the importance of authenticity and transparency in art transactions, reinforcing the legal framework around cultural property.